joe, beta

law, tech, and stuff for geeks.
/Blog   /About   /Blogroll   /Google Me   /RSS   /Test
Filed under

Privacy

 

Quick Quote: Wal-Mart giving away RFID tags, just buy some undies -- via @WSJ [Privacy]

Comments [0]

While the tags can be removed from clothing and packages, they can't be turned off, and they are trackable. Some privacy advocates hypothesize that unscrupulous marketers or criminals will be able to drive by consumers' homes and scan their garbage to discover what they have recently bought.

Read more about RFIDs at Wikipedia, but basically they're little tags that can be read remotely from a limited distance and are used by retailers to track physical inventory.

They cost about a dollar and you can buy them here, but why pay when you can pull 'em off your skivvies.

The privacy concerns are real, but probably not as big an issue in this case since the information seems to identify the brand and possibly the specific store location from which the items were purchased.

As long as people are telling consumers there are RFID tags in their merchandise, and offering a brief definition of what they can do, things look okay.

I get nervous about the seeming proliferation of these tags, and whether or not a time will come when they near ubiquity and consumers aren't made properly aware of their presence in most merchandise.

Source: Wall Street Journal

"EPIC Testifies in Congress on Cybersecurity and Privacy" [Privacy]

Comments [0]

EPIC Executive Director Marc Rotenberg testified today before the House Committee on Science and Technology regarding Planning for the Future of Cyber Attack Attribution. In his prepared statement, Mr. Rotenberg discussed "the risks and limitations of a mandatory Internet ID that may be favored by some as a way to address the risk of cyber attack." He explained how such a proposal would implicate human rights and online freedom, and questioned the constitutionality of such a measure.

@ThisWeekInLaw Episode 67 Covers Privacy (this post brought to you with a little help from @drPodder) [Privacy]

Comments [0]

The message below the three asterisks was generated by drPodder for webOS, the only podcatcher worth using on webOS devices. It's so perfect that I left it as it was generated by the app's share-an-episode feature, which spits out the metadata below into an email you can send to anyone -- even Posterous.

This is a really good episode of This Week in Law as far as privacy goes. Yes, another school-related post. Yes, extremely worth your time to listen to so you get a better understanding of how privacy is evolving with current trends in technology and social media, no matter what your industry or occupation.

***

Hi,

I thought you'd like to check out this great podcast I'm enjoying in drPodder on my Palm webOS phone!

To download the episode, just click this link: TWiL 67: Skynet Knows All

To subscribe to this podcast yourself, simply copy the following link and paste it into your favorite Podcatcher!

Podcast Title: this WEEK in LAW
Podcast URL: http://leoville.tv/podcasts/twil.xml

FTC Behavioral Advertising Guidelines, Revised February 2009 [Random Legal Geekery]

Comments [0]

(download)

We're going over this in Cyberprivacy Law and I wanted the report outlining the four principles somewhere easily accessible. So here it is, the Federal Trade Commission's February 2009 revision to its behavioral advertising guidelines. The guidelines were drafted to offer a framework within which the online advertising industry could self-regulate the collection of user data for use in targeted online advertising.

Such romantic reading.

Source: FTC

"Can We Haz Privacy and Security?" Some @Firefox add-ons and a shout-out to @GrouponPhilly [Privacy]

Comments [0]

I said this:
Addons to help you stay safe and secure and maintain your privacy on the web while using Firefox. Some are more complicated to use than others, but consider reading and asking other users for help.

The title isn't very pretty, but sitting in Cyberprivacy class compelled me to make sure I was mentioning some of the better extensions I've come across. Targeted, contextual advertising, done well and with full disclosure, can be mutually beneficial to both consumers and marketers.

These extensions are particularly useful if you find yourself bombarded by poorly or nefariously implemented online marketing strategies.

Hopefully, I'll dig up their equivalents for other browsers soon. Any comments, criticisms, suggestions are welcome.

View the collection ]

Quick Quote: Legal in US for Google to get all up in your insecure payloads? -- via @ElReg [Privacy]

Comments [0]

We believe it does not violate US law to collect payload data from networks that are configured to be openly accessible (i.e., not secured by encryption and thus accessible by any user's device)
Pablo Chavez, Google's Director of Public Policy

Google says yes.

Source: The Register

@Pandora Kills in Brand Recognition Among "Frequent Social Networkers" -- via @alleyinsider [Music]

Comments [0]

This study by Edison Research focused on the demographics of the most avid users of social networks, and the rest of the chart gallery offers a fascinating look into the state of things on the social web.

But what struck me was the massive lead Pandora has over Last.fm in mindshare among these folks. Maybe because the latter is a UK-based service? Or most people are still too shy to share their listening habits with the world?

Whatever the reason, I found it interesting because the study focused on people likely to be early adopters, and nearly all the early adopters I know are avid Last.fm users, while less geeky people gravitate toward Pandora.

Plus, Aol Radio placed second, between top finisher Pandora and bronze medalist Last.fm? I don't even know anyone who has ever mentioned Aol Radio. Maybe their Winamp integration helps?

Takeaway: Last.fm needs to look at ways in which it can reach a wider audience, at least in the United States. Their excellent privacy settings allow you to fine-tune who can see what you're listening to, and Last.fm should trumpet those settings and their ease of use from the digital hilltops to capture users weary of confusing privacy paradigms like the one that got Facebook in hot water recently.

Privacy is a massive strength, as long as you're doing it right from the gate, which Last.fm seems to have accomplished. The next step is to make sure potential users know about that accomplishment and the value controlled scrobbling can have to even the most cloistered music fans.

Source: Silicon Alley Insider

Read more about:

Social Networks >
Music >
Pandora >
Last.fm >

 

In Case You Missed It: Bloggers reblogging, Reuters cropping, Google sniffing [Links]

Comments [0]

Here's a new post that may or may not keep happening. These are the fun stories I looked at but didn't have time to form a cogent opinion on.

  • Appropriately, let's start with a story about "reblogging" -- something I do here all the time and, to be honest, is my bread and butter. Bloggers are, more and more often, stretching the bounds of fair use. But modern reblogging is a vast improvement, and disseminates content without facilitating full-blown plagiarism. [LA Times]
  • Reuters improperly rocking photo editing software in coverage of fatal Israeli attack of an activist ship? The blog Little Green Footballs thought so, and brought it to public light. [FOX News]
  • Google's new "Caffeine" search index collects data faster to offer fresher results. [Official Google Blog]
  • Google lawyers hire computer forensics company to analyze wifi data Google Maps vans collected "by accident," presumably to imply Google's innocence. Results are not so clear-cut. Privacy buffs slap "criminal intent" sticker on the situation and demand, um, something. [The Register]

Publishing My Privacy Assignment About Publishing Sensitive Information [Privacy]

Comments [0]


Image via Flickr user rpongsaj
 
This is an assignment I did for my cyberprivacy law class, the sole summer session course I'm taking between my 1L and 2L years. I have written about many of these issues on joebeta before. It was an ungraded summary of privacy implications on the internet, and will apparently serve as the foundation for some work we'll be doing for the rest of the summer session (the class ends mid-July).
 
I'm publishing it here so I can get feedback from those more knowledgeable than I am on how accurate everything is, as I wrote it up from what I already knew, looking for examples from recent events to fill out the general ideas.
 
Maybe those less knowledgeable will learn something, too, which is all I can ask. Remember folks: be safe out there.
 
Click through for the (longish) article.
 

Read the rest of this post »

Online NHTSA Database Made Names, SSN, and More Publicly Available -- via @TTAC [Privacy]

Comments [0]

The complaint database contains everything, from someone who has heard something somewhere from someone, to detailed accident investigations. Want to beat a ticket? File a report. Try to get out of jail where you landed due to vehicular manslaughter? File a report. Want to smear a manufacturer you don’t like? File a report. Have a serious problem? File a report. It’s all there.

Until yesterday, some of the more carefully filed reports had PDFs of scanned documents attached. These documents ran the gamut from lawyer letters to accident reports prepared by uniformed police. You could find search warrants for black boxes. You could find data readouts from black boxes. You also could find a lot of personal information. That is all gone.

See the video of how it all worked before the NHTSA (presumably) read the story and shut down the database: