joe, beta

law, tech, and stuff for geeks.
/Blog   /About   /RSS   /Google Me   /Test
Filed under

Intellectual Property

 

5th Cir. decision narrows restrictive power of DRM within that circuit's jurisdiction, but... -- by @reckless on @engadget [Copyright]

Comments [0]

I mentioned earlier today that updated rules from the Library of Congress mean it's okay to jailbreak phones, use brief clips from movies in your own mashups, and drag your unlocked phone to any carrier you want.

Engadget Managing Editor and recovering patent attorney Nilay Patel offers some great insight on the opinion (a PDF of which is included in this post), from the Fifth Circuit. The decision limits the restrictive power of digital rights management (DRM) constructs aimed at preventing unauthorized copying of copyrighted works, but it doesn't invalidate them.

While on the one hand, as my headline suggests, the restriction is narrower following the ruling, Patel's analysis focuses on reminding everyone of a very important distinction, and the whole post is worth a read, for background facts and more of Patel's cogent reading of the opinion.

His main point, as I read it, is that yes, people in Fifth Circuit jurisdictions (Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas) could theoretically rip a movie clip from a DVD for use in their own video mashup (something also okay under the aforementioned Library of Congress rule change) BUT:

it's still very much illegal to strip copy protection DRM off a video in order to transfer it to a portable media player, for example, since you're making an unauthorized copy. It's a subtle, but extremely important distinction.

Source: Engadget  

 

Loading mentions Retweet

Quick Quote: @EFF convinces Copyright Office to OK jailbreaking, mashups, more -- via BoingBoing by @doctorow [Law]

Comments [0]

EFF had applied to the Copyright Office to grant exemptions permitting the cracking of DRM in three cases: first, to "jailbreak" a mobile device, such as an iPhone, where DRM is used to prevent phone owners from running software of their own choosing; second, to allow video remix artists to break the DRM on DVDs in order to take short excerpts for mashups posted to YouTube and other sharing sites; finally EFF got the Copyright Office to renew its ruling that made it illegal to unlock cellphones so that they can be used with any carrier.

I haven't read the EFF press release Doctorow is writing about here, but a cursory read of his article indicates that this development should water down that pirate flavoring attendant upon activities like jailbreaking phones and ripping video from DVDs for limited use in derivative works.

Unfortunately, Doctorow also mentions that the odd US logic seemingly retracted by these moves by the Copyright Office is still being supported in US influence on foreign copyright policy. Read his article at Boing Boing for more on that.

Via: Boing Boing
Source: EFF

Loading mentions Retweet

Judge reduces "unconstitutional" $675k damages award to $67k in P2P case, RIAA is weally, weally mad! [P2P]

Comments [0]

Not much to say here: the law needs to be changed so such outrageous damages awards in P2P file sharing (read, typically: music stealing) aren't possible in the first place. I've written about crazy P2P cases before, and this just adds to the confusion. The message here and in other recent cases is that trial-level awards are out of control and don't represent the financial harm actually done. This is out of step with the legislative construct that makes such awards possible. Expect an appeal from the RIAA, but boy do I hope this ruling sticks.

Source: Techdirt

Loading mentions Retweet

To Read: "Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars From Gutenberg to Gates" by Adrian Johns -- via @BoingBoing [Image]

Comments [0]

I know I already posted a story from Boing Boing and I try not to hit the same site up twice in a row, but when you got, you got it, and it's safe to say that the internet agrees: Boing Boing has it.

This time they're done a quick blurb on the book you see pictured above, a 500-page behemoth on Cory Doctorow's currently-reading list was reviewed by the EFF's Fred von Lohmann, and was highly recommended.

Ironically, I'll probably have to wait until after my summer session course in Cyberprivacy has concluded before I can sink my teeth into it this, but that won't stop me from buying it today (Amazon).

Source: Boing Boing

Loading mentions Retweet

"Hearing from America on Intellectual Property" -- via The White House Blog [Quote]

Comments [0]

Perhaps most importantly, through these meetings and through the comments we received from the general public, we have received some excellent recommendations about how the United States government can improve our efforts to enforce our intellectual property, with some of the best ideas coming from the smallest companies.

I scanned the list of comments Ms. Espinel's office received, and, although I haven't had a chance to read them yet, I thought I'd link to the PDF versions of some prominent comments:

AT&T:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/IPEC/frn_comments/AT_T.pdf

Motion Picture Association of America:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/IPEC/frn_comments/MotionPicturesAssociationofAm...

Public Knowledge, EFF, and others:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/IPEC/frn_comments/PublicKnowledge.pdf

Time Warner, Inc.:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/IPEC/frn_comments/TimeWarnerInc.pdf

Loading mentions Retweet

"LimeWire sliced by RIAA, liable for massive infringement" -- via Ars Technica [Quote]

Comments [0]

Judge Kimba Wood has just granted summary judgment against LimeWire, agreeing with the labels that the peer-to-peer company was liable for inducing copyright infringement. Turns out that asking LimeWire downloaders to check a box marked "I will not use LimeWire for copyright infringement" before proceeding doesn't count as "meaningful efforts to mitigate infringement.

This isn't very surprising. LimeWire is one of those peer-to-peer clients from back in the day that came with baked-in media players. The intent was clear. And I have no authority to cite for this assertion, but I suspect they made a lot of money by bundling spyware with at least their earliest versions.

Loading mentions Retweet

Report: Companies benefiting from copyright limitations generated over $4 trillion in revenue in 2007 [PDF]

Comments [0]

The Computer and Communications Industry Association released the below report recently, aiming to quantify the economic impact of copyright limitations like fair use. Fair use is an exception to copyright's standard prohibition against using the creative works of others in your own work.

The fair use doctrine is often used as a defense against allegations of intellectual property theft and piracy, sometimes legitimately and sometimes not. I haven't had a chance to read the report yet (exams this week and next...) but it's worth at least a skim.

More information:

Read "Fair Use in the U.S. Economy" below, via CCIA through Threat Level:

Loading mentions Retweet

"When Copyright Goes Bad" documentary by Consumers International -- via @Boing Boing [Video]

Comments [0]

Loading mentions Retweet

ACTA Draft Released [PDF]

Comments [0]

I haven't read it yet, but considering my ongoing interest in ACTA's development, you can be sure I'll go over it later today or tomorrow and give my thoughts. For now, Ars Technica has an analysis of it's own. Their breakdown is pretty in-depth, but their conclusion is simple: the draft is, compared to earlier leaked portions, "still bad, but a tiny bit better."

Loading mentions Retweet

US Trade Rep: ACTA draft will be released to public on April 21st -- Via @USTradeRep [Quote]

Comments [0]

Overall, therefore, there was a general sense from this session that negotiations have now advanced to a point where making a draft text available to the public will help the process of reaching a final agreement. For that reason, and based on the specific momentum coming out of this meeting, participants have reached unanimous agreement that the time is right for making available to the public the consolidated text coming out of these discussions, which will reflect the substantial progress made at this round.   

It is intended to release this on Wednesday 21 April. 

I'll post it when it is available, some time on Wednesday.

Loading mentions Retweet